Did you know? You are on the cutting edge of education.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/education/02blogs.html?_r=1
Steve
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Week Seven Assignments are Up and the Links Are Hot
The discussion starter and assignments for the week have been posted. This week, make sure to read the essay on the week's reading and how it fits into the larger picture of what you are reading. It is posted below.
Week Seven: "The Sublime Life: Constructing Your Self, Walking, and the Legacies of American Romanticism"
"It is something to be able to paint a particular picture, or to carve a statue, and so make a few objects beautiful; but it is far more glorious to carve and paint the very atmosphere and medium through which we look. To affect the quality of the day– that is the highest of the arts.” --Thoreau, Walden, "Where I Lived, and What I Lived For," HB 1758.
One of the reasons I have come to question the value of the traditional literature class is that such classes do little to help us understand what literature can do for us besides allowing a platform for showing off how smart we think ourselves to be. A class in reading should teach us more. Learning to read literature and use it has little to do with grades or school. If literature has nothing to teach us that we can use to make our lives better, make us happier, or make the lives of others better, by definition it is useless; and, it deserves to be relegated to the trash.
Hence, we read for a number of reasons, but the main ones are the same reasons we go to the gym, namely, to create selves who are better able to live long, happy, constructive lives, and--if we are really lucky--we learn to enjoy the exercise and play we use to construct such a self. We read to exercise our minds and hearts. We read so as to understand ourselves, our world, and others better than we already do. Sometimes this means reading texts and authors which are difficult to understand and who stretch and make sore the emotional and intellectual mussels we use to read and interpret.
No one promised that the ideas which will make life meaningful and worth living will be easy to grasp, nor is life fair enough to present such ideas just when we are ready to hear them; so, we read and practice reading and interpreting so as to be ready with the well-developed interpretative skills we need to recognize the good, usable ideas which are illusive, hard to grasp, and which stretch our thinking to degrees we never thought ourselves capable. As you found over the past several week, learning to get the most out of authors, like Emerson, Thoreau, or Poe can be an exercise in building one's interpretative muscles; such hard reading often pays off in the ideas that make our lives make more sense and allow us to construct lives which are happier and richer than they would be without having struggled through the likes of Emerson, but Emerson is a philosopher king--the Man Thinking.
The main author we will read this week, Henry David Thoreau, is more down to earth and practical than his mentor and friend, Emerson. Thoreau wants to get us thinking, but he wants us to be thinking about how we live our everyday lives and, equally important, how we can construct these lives so we can develop that self we want to be in our heart of hearts. In other words, while Emerson will call for thinkers who were men of Action. Thoreau answers this call. Thoreau wants his readers our living--really living; hence, he writes essays about "Walking" or "Where I Lived and What I Lived For."
Thoreau was one of those rare individuals who knew how to live a good, moral, down to earth life. In every measure which matters, he was a good man. In fact, his life and thinking has inspired other good men, like Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Kennedy, to live better lives; yet, people tend to think of him as some sort of back to nature nut. These folks aren't ready to hear what Thoreau has to say.
Thoreau wants us to be awake to the possibilities life has to offer. That's it.
Walden; or, Life in the Woods, the book from which one of the essays you read a couple of weeks back is taken, "Where I Lived, and What I Lived For," was about two years Thoreau spent in an experiment in which he tried to figure out the absolute minimum one needed to live a life where one was awake to all life has to offer AND capable of enjoying everything life has to offer He goes to the woods, as he says in the paragraph following the one quoted above, to figure out how to "live life deliberately." However, he also goes to the woods because he cares about his readers, and he wants us to live a life as rich as that he experienced while living on Walden pond.
Thoreau decides of living close to nature because he wants to strip away everything which isn't necessary to living a full life, and then build back in only those things which add to a better, even more full life. He also wanted to strip away the things which can get in the way of living a good, happy, spiritually full life, and he firmly believes that getting in touch with your real self is sometimes easier with some solitude, privacy, and time to think. By the way, the reason he leaves Walden pond is that he recognized that the fullest life possible wasn't limited to a cabin in the woods, and he has other things he wanted to explore.
Thoreau doesn't, as many will tell you, want you to head off and live in a cabin in the woods. He's led that life, and he wrote about it so you don't have to go live in the woods. That is, unless this is the life *you* decide you need to live fully and to get from life all it has to offer. Like Emerson, Thoreau thinks that living the good life begins with developing a sense of who you are and who you want to be and then being awake enough to the world and life's possibilities to take advantage of the opportunities and obstacles life offers. (This is why Thoreau spends so much time talking about the wonders of the morning and being fully awake.)
You get to the point of knowing yourself and what you want through visiting with others, working, reading, spending time in nature, thinking and, because one isn't complete without helping others, sharing what you have learned and know to help others make their life better.
One of the rather cool things about Thoreau is he isn't a snob. He doesn't just talk about living; he lives. He is, as Emerson would say, Man Acting. Thoreau knows and lives the fact that you can construct a full life being a farmer, pencil maker, handyman, writer, or anything else, but you have to start with spending the time to figure out what you want and then making sure life itself doesn't get in the way. As the quote above says, this is, according to Thoreau, "the highest of arts."
Over the past couple of months, you've thought about what it means to be an American, about American culture, and about how to define your ideal self to your self and for others. This is, as one of your classmates said, deep stuff.
For Romantic, American Transcendentalist, like Thoreau, Emerson, and the other authors you'll read this week, changing society begins with creating people who are willing and able to change and be their selves first. Being one's self and creating a life where one can be one's self and continue to develop one's self is the greatest challenge facing you as an individual, but the payoff to both yourself and to society is phenomenal. This is the great American challenge and dream, and it is the only pursuit through which American culture can develop its own potential.
Transcendentalist (that is, America's primary brand of Romanticism) were, like most Americans of their time, optimists. They tended to think of others as essentially good. One key to learning to understand others is to realize that few get up in the morning and think, "Today is a good day for me to do evil." Usually, evil happens because people don't understand the consequences of their actions and the limitations of their understanding of the world. Few people, given a choice between acting selfishly and acting in a manner which will help both their selves and their neighbors, will choose to act selfishly. The trick then, at least according to the Transcendentalist, is to figure out for one's self and then to help teach others how we transcend our own ignorance, how we are connected to others and through Nature, and to show--through our own life--how easy and good it is to live well.
Think of this week's reading, that is, Thoreau's essay "Walking" and the selection of poems by several authors as a broad swath of the things which inspired American Romantic writers. Last week you saw how the horror could be used to inspire intense emotion; this is what Poe was about.However, the sublime--those moments of intense emotion where words fail, but you know you are alive--can come from almost any time and place. They can come from Nature, but they can also come from being a nurse to the wounded, thinking about a cable that connects Europe and America, etc. There is no short list of the inspiration which leads one to the sublime.
"Walking," according to Thoreau, is part of the answer to living a good life, and it is one source of the sublime and constructing a sublime life. "Walking," however, is as much about connecting to Nature and using this connection to experience high emotion as it is about the walk. My father used to say, "You don't fish to catch fish. You fish to go fishing."
"Walking" is an essay which talks about getting out into Nature. Thoreau sees walking and nature as a necessary aspects of the full life, that is, a life where you understand why you are here and how to live well. Thoreau is speaking in "Walking" about Nature written large with a capital "N," namely, he is talking about the Wilderness, but he is also speaking about Nature as anything and everything outside of the self. One means of learning to find nature--little "n"-- is learning to walk through it in productive ways. The other secrets of the good life, at least in how Thoreau sees it, are packed into the chapter titles of Walden--which you won't be reading this week--namely, reading, solitude, working, visiting, working with others, etc. In fact, one profitable way to look at Walden is as a discussion of how to live a decent, well constructed life. It is a primer in "the highest of arts."
You'll find your homework in "the highest of arts" in the blog prompt for the week, which asks you to go for a figurative and/or literal walk and to write about it. The class discussion this week will follow up on your blog posts on the sublime from last week. As always, the assignments for the week are spelled out on the "Assignments" page, and you should continue to pay attention to the website's home page for class announcements and hints on doing well in the course.
As always, write with questions.
Steve
One of the reasons I have come to question the value of the traditional literature class is that such classes do little to help us understand what literature can do for us besides allowing a platform for showing off how smart we think ourselves to be. A class in reading should teach us more. Learning to read literature and use it has little to do with grades or school. If literature has nothing to teach us that we can use to make our lives better, make us happier, or make the lives of others better, by definition it is useless; and, it deserves to be relegated to the trash.
Hence, we read for a number of reasons, but the main ones are the same reasons we go to the gym, namely, to create selves who are better able to live long, happy, constructive lives, and--if we are really lucky--we learn to enjoy the exercise and play we use to construct such a self. We read to exercise our minds and hearts. We read so as to understand ourselves, our world, and others better than we already do. Sometimes this means reading texts and authors which are difficult to understand and who stretch and make sore the emotional and intellectual mussels we use to read and interpret.
No one promised that the ideas which will make life meaningful and worth living will be easy to grasp, nor is life fair enough to present such ideas just when we are ready to hear them; so, we read and practice reading and interpreting so as to be ready with the well-developed interpretative skills we need to recognize the good, usable ideas which are illusive, hard to grasp, and which stretch our thinking to degrees we never thought ourselves capable. As you found over the past several week, learning to get the most out of authors, like Emerson, Thoreau, or Poe can be an exercise in building one's interpretative muscles; such hard reading often pays off in the ideas that make our lives make more sense and allow us to construct lives which are happier and richer than they would be without having struggled through the likes of Emerson, but Emerson is a philosopher king--the Man Thinking.
The main author we will read this week, Henry David Thoreau, is more down to earth and practical than his mentor and friend, Emerson. Thoreau wants to get us thinking, but he wants us to be thinking about how we live our everyday lives and, equally important, how we can construct these lives so we can develop that self we want to be in our heart of hearts. In other words, while Emerson will call for thinkers who were men of Action. Thoreau answers this call. Thoreau wants his readers our living--really living; hence, he writes essays about "Walking" or "Where I Lived and What I Lived For."
Thoreau was one of those rare individuals who knew how to live a good, moral, down to earth life. In every measure which matters, he was a good man. In fact, his life and thinking has inspired other good men, like Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Kennedy, to live better lives; yet, people tend to think of him as some sort of back to nature nut. These folks aren't ready to hear what Thoreau has to say.
Thoreau wants us to be awake to the possibilities life has to offer. That's it.
Walden; or, Life in the Woods, the book from which one of the essays you read a couple of weeks back is taken, "Where I Lived, and What I Lived For," was about two years Thoreau spent in an experiment in which he tried to figure out the absolute minimum one needed to live a life where one was awake to all life has to offer AND capable of enjoying everything life has to offer He goes to the woods, as he says in the paragraph following the one quoted above, to figure out how to "live life deliberately." However, he also goes to the woods because he cares about his readers, and he wants us to live a life as rich as that he experienced while living on Walden pond.
Thoreau decides of living close to nature because he wants to strip away everything which isn't necessary to living a full life, and then build back in only those things which add to a better, even more full life. He also wanted to strip away the things which can get in the way of living a good, happy, spiritually full life, and he firmly believes that getting in touch with your real self is sometimes easier with some solitude, privacy, and time to think. By the way, the reason he leaves Walden pond is that he recognized that the fullest life possible wasn't limited to a cabin in the woods, and he has other things he wanted to explore.
Thoreau doesn't, as many will tell you, want you to head off and live in a cabin in the woods. He's led that life, and he wrote about it so you don't have to go live in the woods. That is, unless this is the life *you* decide you need to live fully and to get from life all it has to offer. Like Emerson, Thoreau thinks that living the good life begins with developing a sense of who you are and who you want to be and then being awake enough to the world and life's possibilities to take advantage of the opportunities and obstacles life offers. (This is why Thoreau spends so much time talking about the wonders of the morning and being fully awake.)
You get to the point of knowing yourself and what you want through visiting with others, working, reading, spending time in nature, thinking and, because one isn't complete without helping others, sharing what you have learned and know to help others make their life better.
One of the rather cool things about Thoreau is he isn't a snob. He doesn't just talk about living; he lives. He is, as Emerson would say, Man Acting. Thoreau knows and lives the fact that you can construct a full life being a farmer, pencil maker, handyman, writer, or anything else, but you have to start with spending the time to figure out what you want and then making sure life itself doesn't get in the way. As the quote above says, this is, according to Thoreau, "the highest of arts."
Over the past couple of months, you've thought about what it means to be an American, about American culture, and about how to define your ideal self to your self and for others. This is, as one of your classmates said, deep stuff.
For Romantic, American Transcendentalist, like Thoreau, Emerson, and the other authors you'll read this week, changing society begins with creating people who are willing and able to change and be their selves first. Being one's self and creating a life where one can be one's self and continue to develop one's self is the greatest challenge facing you as an individual, but the payoff to both yourself and to society is phenomenal. This is the great American challenge and dream, and it is the only pursuit through which American culture can develop its own potential.
Transcendentalist (that is, America's primary brand of Romanticism) were, like most Americans of their time, optimists. They tended to think of others as essentially good. One key to learning to understand others is to realize that few get up in the morning and think, "Today is a good day for me to do evil." Usually, evil happens because people don't understand the consequences of their actions and the limitations of their understanding of the world. Few people, given a choice between acting selfishly and acting in a manner which will help both their selves and their neighbors, will choose to act selfishly. The trick then, at least according to the Transcendentalist, is to figure out for one's self and then to help teach others how we transcend our own ignorance, how we are connected to others and through Nature, and to show--through our own life--how easy and good it is to live well.
Think of this week's reading, that is, Thoreau's essay "Walking" and the selection of poems by several authors as a broad swath of the things which inspired American Romantic writers. Last week you saw how the horror could be used to inspire intense emotion; this is what Poe was about.However, the sublime--those moments of intense emotion where words fail, but you know you are alive--can come from almost any time and place. They can come from Nature, but they can also come from being a nurse to the wounded, thinking about a cable that connects Europe and America, etc. There is no short list of the inspiration which leads one to the sublime.
"Walking," according to Thoreau, is part of the answer to living a good life, and it is one source of the sublime and constructing a sublime life. "Walking," however, is as much about connecting to Nature and using this connection to experience high emotion as it is about the walk. My father used to say, "You don't fish to catch fish. You fish to go fishing."
"Walking" is an essay which talks about getting out into Nature. Thoreau sees walking and nature as a necessary aspects of the full life, that is, a life where you understand why you are here and how to live well. Thoreau is speaking in "Walking" about Nature written large with a capital "N," namely, he is talking about the Wilderness, but he is also speaking about Nature as anything and everything outside of the self. One means of learning to find nature--little "n"-- is learning to walk through it in productive ways. The other secrets of the good life, at least in how Thoreau sees it, are packed into the chapter titles of Walden--which you won't be reading this week--namely, reading, solitude, working, visiting, working with others, etc. In fact, one profitable way to look at Walden is as a discussion of how to live a decent, well constructed life. It is a primer in "the highest of arts."
You'll find your homework in "the highest of arts" in the blog prompt for the week, which asks you to go for a figurative and/or literal walk and to write about it. The class discussion this week will follow up on your blog posts on the sublime from last week. As always, the assignments for the week are spelled out on the "Assignments" page, and you should continue to pay attention to the website's home page for class announcements and hints on doing well in the course.
As always, write with questions.
Steve
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Subscribe To
Posts
All Comments